Firewalls and VPNs lab 14 of 16
Troubleshooting phase 2 - selectors NAT and routing
Two tunnels to an IOS head office are broken by five realistic phase 2 faults on an ASA, a FortiGate and the IOS router: mismatched selectors, a NAT exemption in the wrong section, a route-based peer given narrow selectors, a safety route that wins, and a route that sends VPN traffic to the internet. Find each one from the evidence, fix it and prove both tunnels carry traffic both ways.
Run this lab
It needs Lite: its 6 nodes are set to 6 vCPU and 6,144 MB in total. That fits the free demo too.
In your workspace: Shared, then Firewalls and VPNs multi-vendor guided labs, then 14 - Troubleshooting phase 2 - selectors NAT and routing
- Level
- Advanced
- Time
- About 90 minutes
- Nodes need
- 6 vCPU, 6,144 MB
- Smallest plan
- Lite
The scenario
Hollins Timber's head office router (HQ) has two site-to-site tunnels: a crypto map to the ASA at the sawmill (site A) and a VTI to the FortiGate at the depot (site B). After a weekend of "tidying up" by three different people, nothing crosses either tunnel. The ticket says phase 1 is fine. There are five faults in phase 2, NAT and routing, spread across all three devices. Find them from the evidence, not by reading every line of configuration, and record which command showed you each one.
| Device | Interface | Address | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| ISP | Gi0/0 / Gi0/1 / Gi0/2 | 203.0.113.1/30 / 198.51.100.1/30 / 192.0.2.1/30 | |
| HQ | Gi0/0 / Lo0 / Tunnel2 | 203.0.113.2/30 / 10.0.0.1/24 / 169.254.14.1/30 | Crypto map to A, VTI to B |
| A-FW | inside / outside | 10.1.0.1/24 / 198.51.100.2/30 | PAT for the LAN |
| A-PC | Gi0/0 | 10.1.0.10/24 | |
| B-FW | port1 / port2 / to-HQ | 192.0.2.2/30 / 10.2.0.1/24 / 169.254.14.2 | |
| B-PC | Gi0/0 | 10.2.0.10/24 |
| Tunnel | Design | Crypto | Protected traffic |
|---|---|---|---|
| HQ to A-FW | Crypto map on both | IKEv2 AES-256-GCM, DH 20 | 10.0.0.0/24 to and from 10.1.0.0/24 |
| HQ to B-FW | Route-based on both | IKEv2 DES/SHA-256, DH 14 (FortiGate evaluation limit) | Whatever is routed into the tunnel |
What you’ll practise
- Separate phase 1 problems from phase 2 problems with each vendor's SA commands
- Recognise TS_UNACCEPTABLE and mirrored-selector faults on a crypto map
- Find one-way traffic from encrypt and decrypt counters, and trace it to NAT order on the ASA
- Match a FortiGate phase 2 to a route-based peer
- Read routing as part of the VPN: a blackhole route that wins and a route that bypasses the tunnel
- Verify the repair on IOS, ASA and FortiGate
The tasks
- Confirm the ticket: is phase 1 really fine?
- Site A, phase 2
- Site A, one-way traffic
- Site B, phase 2 and routing
- Prove it
The Lab Tasks pane has the scenario, these tasks, the checks to run, hints and the full solution.
Topology and devices
The network as it opens in EVE-NG, drawn from the lab’s own canvas, and the image each node runs.
Every link, as text
- ISP
Gi0/0to HQGi0/0 - ISP
Gi0/1to A-FWGi0/1 - ISP
Gi0/2to B-FWport1 - A-FW
Gi0/0to A-PCGi0/0 - B-FW
port2to B-PCGi0/0
| Node | Device | Image in Add Node | Set to |
|---|---|---|---|
| ISP | Cisco IOSv | vios-adventerprisek9-m.spa.159-3.m9 | 1 vCPU, 512 MB |
| HQ | Cisco IOSv | vios-adventerprisek9-m.spa.159-3.m9 | 1 vCPU, 512 MB |
| A-FW | Cisco ASAv | asav-9.22.1.1-PLR-Licensed | 1 vCPU, 2,048 MB |
| A-PC | Cisco IOSv | vios-adventerprisek9-m.spa.159-3.m9 | 1 vCPU, 512 MB |
| B-FW | Fortinet FortiGate | fortinet-FGT-v7.0.17.M-build0682 | 1 vCPU, 2,048 MB |
| B-PC | Cisco IOSv | vios-adventerprisek9-m.spa.159-3.m9 | 1 vCPU, 512 MB |
How to open this lab
Sign in to your workspace at
lab.cloudlabbox.com.In File Manager, open Shared, then the folder
Firewalls and VPNs multi-vendor guided labs.Open
14 - Troubleshooting phase 2 - selectors NAT and routingand start its nodes, then open Lab Tasks for the scenario and the steps.
The lab is read-only. You can start the nodes and configure the devices, but changes to the topology can’t be saved. To change it, rebuild it in your own folder.
More Firewalls and VPNs labs
Related labs in other courses
CloudLabBox is independent of Check Point, Cisco, CompTIA, Fortinet, Juniper Networks, MikroTik, Netgate and Palo Alto Networks. The lab follows exam topics and isn’t vendor training material; vendor names identify the exams and the images in the workspace.