CCNP ENARSI lab 12 of 35
Troubleshooting redistribution, administrative distance and route control
Six months after the OSPF and EIGRP domains were joined, redundancy has quietly disappeared and parts of the plant are unreachable. Find six faults in seed metrics, prefix lists, route maps and administrative distance, and restore the design.
Run this lab
It needs Lite: its 4 nodes are set to 4 vCPU and 2,048 MB in total. That fits the free demo too.
In your workspace: Shared, then CCNP ENARSI 300-410 guided labs, then 12 - Troubleshooting redistribution administrative distance and route control
- Level
- Advanced
- Time
- About 80 minutes
- Nodes need
- 4 vCPU, 2,048 MB
- Smallest plan
- Lite
The scenario
This is Ravensworth Foods again (lab 11), six months later. The design hasn't changed: R2 and R3 redistribute in both directions with tags 90 (EIGRP → OSPF) and 110 (OSPF → EIGRP), each boundary router only sends plant prefixes (prefix list PLANT: 172.16.0.0/16 and all its subnets, and 192.168.44.0/24) into OSPF, seed metric 100000 100 255 1 1500 into EIGRP, and **distance ospf external 175 on both boundary routers. R4 redistributes only its control network (Loopback44) into EIGRP. HQ must reach the plant through both** boundary routers, and the plant must reach HQ through both.
After a quarter of "small changes" the monitoring team reports:
- "R4 only has one path back to HQ (through R3); the R2 path disappeared."
- "HQ can't reach the plant LAN 172.16.4.0/24 at all."
- "HQ can't reach the plant control network 192.168.44.0/24, and an unknown network 192.168.4.0/24 has appeared in the plant."
- "HQ monitoring can't reach R3's management address 10.255.0.3 although R3 is up."
- "R3 sends plant traffic the long way round, through HQ." (visible once tickets 2 and 3 are fixed)
| Device | Interface | Address | Domain |
|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | Gi0/0 / Gi0/1 / Lo1 | 10.0.12.1 / 10.0.13.1 / 10.1.1.1 /24 | OSPF |
| R2 | Gi0/0 / Gi0/1 | 10.0.12.2/24 (OSPF) / 172.16.24.2/24 (EIGRP) | both |
| R3 | Gi0/0 / Gi0/1 | 10.0.13.3/24 (OSPF) / 172.16.34.3/24 (EIGRP) | both |
| R4 | Gi0/0 / Gi0/1 | 172.16.24.4 / 172.16.34.4 /24 | EIGRP |
| R4 | Lo1 / Lo4 / Lo44 | 172.16.4.1 / 192.168.4.1 / 192.168.44.1 /24 | plant LAN / spare (never advertise) / control |
| R1–R3 | Lo0 | 10.255.0.n/32 | OSPF |
What you’ll practise
- Trace a prefix through redistribution: origin, redistribution point, other domain
- Diagnose missing seed metrics, missing route maps and prefix-list length errors
- Diagnose a route map that matches the wrong object
- Recognise administrative-distance faults, including a distance of 255
The tasks
- Follow each missing prefix from its source
- Restore redistribution into OSPF (tickets 2 and 3)
- Restore redistribution into EIGRP (ticket 1)
- Fix the administrative-distance faults (tickets 4 and 5)
- Prove the design is restored
The Lab Tasks pane has the scenario, these tasks, the checks to run, hints and the full solution.
Topology and devices
The network as it opens in EVE-NG, drawn from the lab’s own canvas, and the image each node runs.
Every link, as text
- R1
Gi0/0to R2Gi0/0 - R1
Gi0/1to R3Gi0/0 - R2
Gi0/1to R4Gi0/0 - R3
Gi0/1to R4Gi0/1
| Node | Device | Image in Add Node | Set to |
|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | Cisco IOSv | vios-adventerprisek9-m.spa.159-3.m9 | 1 vCPU, 512 MB |
| R2 | Cisco IOSv | vios-adventerprisek9-m.spa.159-3.m9 | 1 vCPU, 512 MB |
| R3 | Cisco IOSv | vios-adventerprisek9-m.spa.159-3.m9 | 1 vCPU, 512 MB |
| R4 | Cisco IOSv | vios-adventerprisek9-m.spa.159-3.m9 | 1 vCPU, 512 MB |
How to open this lab
Sign in to your workspace at
lab.cloudlabbox.com.In File Manager, open Shared, then the folder
CCNP ENARSI 300-410 guided labs.Open
12 - Troubleshooting redistribution administrative distance and route controland start its nodes, then open Lab Tasks for the scenario and the steps.
The lab is read-only. You can start the nodes and configure the devices, but changes to the topology can’t be saved. To change it, rebuild it in your own folder.
More CCNP ENARSI labs
Related labs in other courses
CloudLabBox is independent of Cisco. The lab follows exam topics and isn’t vendor training material; vendor names identify the exams and the images in the workspace.